Over 0–100 km/h, X5 xDrive40i F15 wins (5,42 s vs 6,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 xDrive40i F15 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,42 s−1,29 s | 6,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,71 s−1,22 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,12 s−1,98 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 243 km/h+23 km/h | 220 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,06 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 xDrive40i F15 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,21 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,92 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,42 s | 6,71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,33 s | 8,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,74 s | 15,83 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,18 s | 30,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,71 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,12 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 060 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 043 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 10-speed torque-converter automatic |
Off the line, the X5 xDrive40i hits 100 km/h in 5.42 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. At this point, the X5 xDrive40i leads by 1.29 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X5 xDrive40i is doing 134 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 0.93 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X5 xDrive40i crosses the line in 13.71 s versus 14.92 s. The 1.21 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X5 xDrive40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X5 xDrive40i finishes in 25.11 s versus 27.09 s, with a 1.98 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X5 xDrive40i is capped at 243 km/h, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.06 kg/hp vs 6.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 1.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 xDrive40i F15 wins (5,42 s vs 6,71 s).
X5 xDrive40i F15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 xDrive40i F15: 340 hp, ratio 6,06 kg/hp. Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp.
X5 xDrive40i F15: 243 km/h. Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h.