Over 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 and Terramar VZ are neck and neck (5,29 s vs 5,39 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50d F16 | Terramar VZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s−0,10 s | 5,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s−0,08 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,72 s+0,19 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 261 km/h−11 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,73 kg/hp | 5,57 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50d F16 | Terramar VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,70 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,50 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,83 s | 4,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 5,39 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,14 s | 7,20 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,41 s | 12,09 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,42 s | 19,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,71 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 261 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 670 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Bmw X6 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.29 s versus 5.39 s for the Terramar VZ. The 0.10 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d is doing 135 km/h against 138 km/h for the Terramar VZ. The gap is 0.16 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X6 M50d crosses the line in 13.62 s versus 13.70 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw X6 M50d maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the Terramar VZ keeps accelerating towards 261 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.01 s.
Around 582 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Terramar VZ overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 11 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Terramar VZ finishes in 24.72 s versus 24.91 s. The 0.19 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X6 M50d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.73 kg/hp vs 5.57 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.26 seconds. The 0.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 and Terramar VZ are neck and neck (5,29 s vs 5,39 s, no significant gap).
X6 M50d F16 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X6 M50d F16: 381 hp, ratio 5,73 kg/hp. Terramar VZ: 300 hp, ratio 5,57 kg/hp.
X6 M50d F16: 250 km/h. Terramar VZ: 261 km/h.