Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 8,05 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 313 2WD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−2,05 s | 8,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−1,85 s | 16,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s−2,66 s | 28,98 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 233 km/h−53 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,12 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 313 2WD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,24 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 3,75 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 6,07 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 8,05 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,72 s | 10,66 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,20 s | 19,80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 38,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 16,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 28,98 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 989 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 8.05 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. At this point, the Seal 313 2WD leads by 2.05 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 1.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 16.06 s. The 1.85 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 313 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 313 2WD finishes in 26.31 s versus 28.98 s, with a 2.67 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (233 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Seal 313 2WD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.35 kg/hp vs 9.12 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.36 seconds. The 2.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 8,05 s).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 233 km/h.