Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and i4 eDrive35 G26 are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,08 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 313 2WD | i4 eDrive35 G26 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−0,08 s | 6,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−0,17 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 26,26 s+0,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 190 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 313 2WD | i4 eDrive35 G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,74 s | 1,69 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,81 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,56 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 6,08 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,72 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,20 s | 14,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 26,26 stight gap |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.08 s for the i4 eDrive35. The 0.08 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 131 km/h for the i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.03 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the i4 eDrive35 keeps accelerating towards 190 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.29 s.
Around 949 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the i4 eDrive35 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 10 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the i4 eDrive35 finishes in 26.26 s versus 26.31 s. The 0.05 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the i4 eDrive35 at 190 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.35 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and i4 eDrive35 G26 are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,08 s, no significant gap).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h.