Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and i4 eDrive35 G26 are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,08 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 313 2WD | i4 eDrive35 G26 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−0,08 s | 6,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−0,17 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 26,26 s+0,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 190 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 313 2WD | i4 eDrive35 G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,74 s | 1,69 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,81 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,56 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 6,08 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,72 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,20 s | 14,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 26,26 stight gap |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.08 s for the Bmw i4 eDrive35. The 0.08 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 131 km/h for the Bmw i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.03 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the Bmw i4 eDrive35 keeps accelerating towards 190 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.29 s.
Around 949 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw i4 eDrive35 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 10 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 finishes in 26.26 s versus 26.31 s. The 0.05 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 at 190 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.35 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and i4 eDrive35 G26 are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,08 s, no significant gap).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h.