Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar VZ gagne (5,39 s vs 5,68 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Terramar VZ | Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,39 s−0,29 s | 5,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,71 s−0,21 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,72 s−0,63 s | 25,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+61 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,37 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Terramar VZ | Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,70 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,50 s | 2,38 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,06 s | 4,13 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,39 s | 5,68 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,20 s | 7,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,09 s | 13,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,78 s | 21,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,71 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,72 s | 25,35 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 670 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Inline-3 Turbo E-Tech (H5F 150) |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 910 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
Off the line, the Terramar VZ hits 100 km/h in 5.39 s versus 5.68 s for the Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300. Despite the faster sprint time, the Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Terramar VZ is doing 138 km/h against 133 km/h for the Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Terramar VZ crosses the line in 13.70 s versus 13.92 s. The 0.22 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Terramar VZ continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Terramar VZ finishes in 24.72 s versus 25.35 s, with a 0.63 s lead.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.57 kg/hp vs 6.37 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.75 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar VZ gagne (5,39 s vs 5,68 s).
Terramar VZ passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,39 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Terramar VZ : 300 hp, ratio 5,57 kg/hp. Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 : 300 hp, ratio 6,37 kg/hp.
Terramar VZ : 261 km/h. Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 : 200 km/h.