Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 3,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 GTS | Model X Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,05 s+0,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,66 s−0,26 s | 10,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,25 s−0,67 s | 19,92 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h+65 km/h | 262 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,04 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,16 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 GTS | Model X Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,92 s | 0,89 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 1,48 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,47 s | 2,37 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,05 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 3,91 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,94 s | 6,45 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,89 s | 10,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,66 s | 10,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,25 s | 19,92 s |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 262 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 3.15 s for the 812 GTS. The instant torque of 1,139 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 0.10 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 GTS is doing 178 km/h against 168 km/h for the Model X Performance. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 GTS crosses the line in 10.66 s versus 10.92 s. The 0.26 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 812 GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 245 km/h versus 233 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 GTS finishes in 19.24 s versus 19.92 s, with a 0.68 s lead.
Electronically capped at 262 km/h, the Model X Performance never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.43 seconds. The 0.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 3,15 s).
812 GTS goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 GTS: 799 hp, ratio 2,04 kg/hp. Model X Performance: 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp.
812 GTS: 327 km/h. Model X Performance: 262 km/h.