Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 7,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e:Ny1 | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,58 s+0,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,82 s | 15,62 s+0,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,88 s+0,53 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 200 km/h−40 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,34 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e:Ny1 | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,17 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,63 s | 2,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,87 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,24 s | 10,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,60 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,82 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 677 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Compass 4xe hits 100 km/h in 7.58 s versus 7.76 s for the e:Ny1. At this point, the Compass 4xe leads by 0.18 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Compass 4xe is doing 116 km/h against 122 km/h for the e:Ny1. The gap is 0.44 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Compass 4xe crosses the line in 15.62 s versus 15.82 s. The 0.20 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Compass 4xe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Compass 4xe finishes in 28.87 s versus 29.40 s, with a 0.53 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e:Ny1 is capped at 160 km/h, the Compass 4xe at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.34 kg/hp vs 9.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 0.18 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 7,76 s).
e:Ny1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e:Ny1: 201 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp. Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
e:Ny1: 160 km/h. Compass 4xe: 200 km/h.