Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AE-PACEPetrolvsBGLCDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · GLC

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs Mercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2023 · Methodology
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
MercedesDieselFaster

GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254

197 hp · 440 Nm · 1,910 kg · 2023

Result · 0–100 km/h

AJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Gap0.58 sin favour of GLC 220 d 4MATIC
BMercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254

7.77 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254Gap
0–100 km/h8.35 s7.77 s0.58 s · GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
400 m standing start16.19 s15.67 s0.52 s · GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
1,000 m standing start29.41 s28.57 s0.84 s · GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h222 km/h7 km/h · GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
Power-to-weight ratio8.74 kg/hp9.70 kg/hpbetter ratio · E-PACE P200

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
MercedesDieselGLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageE-PACE P200GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
0–30 km/h1.98 s1.65 s
0–50 km/h3.33 s2.83 s
0–80 km/h5.88 s5.50 s
0–100 km/h8.35 s7.77 s
0–120 km/h11.44 s10.79 s
0–160 km/h21.17 s19.54 s
0–200 km/h45.14 s36.44 s
400 m standing start16.19 s15.67 s
1,000 m standing start29.41 s28.57 s
Top speed215 km/h222 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpratio better by 0,96 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
Mercedes

GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254

9,70kg/hpcompensated by −162 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power197 hpPending
Torque440 Nm
Weight1 910 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox9G-Tronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 7.77 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC leads by 0.58 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC is doing 116 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC crosses the line in 15.67 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.52 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 163 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC finishes in 28.57 s versus 29.41 s, with a 0.84 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (215 vs 222 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC at 222 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of E-PACE P200
Audi Q5 SportbackBMW X3 xDrive25dBMW X3 xDrive20d
Instead of GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254
Audi Q3 SUVBMW X1 xDrive25iAudi Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSMercedes

Q5 Sportback vs GLC 220 d 4MATIC

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

MercedesVSBMW

GLC 220 d 4MATIC vs X3 xDrive20d

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254 wins (7,77 s vs 8,35 s).

E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254: 197 hp, ratio 9,70 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. GLC 220 d 4MATIC X254: 222 km/h.