GLC 220 d 4MATIC
197 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 28 D-SUV 2021–2025, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks 9th of 28 in Combined consumption, 21th of 28 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
197hp
440 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 222 km/h
Cons.
5.9L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,993 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 197 hp |
| Couple | 440 Nm |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,9 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 222 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,716 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm |
| Width | 1,890 mm |
| Height | 1,640 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,910 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 155 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 28 D-SUV, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks (top 9 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 9th of 28 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (9th of 28 in Combined consumption)
The GLC 220 d 4MATIC consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the GLC 220 d 4MATIC stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 28 D-SUV marketed between 2021–2025.
Combined consumption
9eout of 28
0–100 km/h
21eout of 28
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 Sportback
204 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
X3 xDrive20d
190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
X4 xDrive25d
231 hp · 0-100 6.8 s
X3 xDrive25d
231 hp · 0-100 6.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes GLC X254 range
Generation X254 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the X254
Compare
Popular duels involving the GLC 220 d 4MATIC
Take the next step
Find a GLC 220 d 4MATIC or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 28 D-SUV 2021–2025, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks 9th of 28 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 21th of 28 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the GLC 220 d 4MATIC vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.