Among the 25 D-SUV 2021–2025, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks 7th of 25 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 20th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
X254 · GENERATION 2023 → · FAMILY SUV
MercedesICE
GLC 220 d 4MATIC
197 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 25 D-SUV 2021–2025, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks 7th of 25 in Combined consumption, 20th of 25 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
197hp
440 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 222 km/h
Cons.
5.9L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,993 cm³ |
| Power | 197 hp |
| Couple | 440 Nm |
| Gearbox | 9 rapports |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.9 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 222 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,716 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm |
| Width | 1,890 mm |
| Height | 1,640 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,910 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 155 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 25 D-SUV, the GLC 220 d 4MATIC ranks (top 7 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 7th of 25 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (7th of 25 in Combined consumption)
The GLC 220 d 4MATIC consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the GLC 220 d 4MATIC stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 25 D-SUV marketed between 2021–2025.
Combined consumption7e / 25
5.9 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h20e / 25
7,7 s
Min 11,8 s · Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 Sportback204 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
X3 xDrive20d190 hp · 0-100 8.0 s
X3 xDrive20d190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
X3 xDrive20d190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes GLC X254 range
Generation X254 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the X254
Compare
Popular duels involving the GLC 220 d 4MATIC
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the GLC 220 d 4MATIC vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.