Over 0–100 km/h, C 300 W206 wins (6,03 s vs 8,36 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | C 300 W206 | 9 E-Tense 250 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.03 s | 8.36 s | 2.33 s · C 300 W206 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.22 s | 16.22 s | 2.00 s · C 300 W206 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.47 s | 28.57 s | 3.10 s · C 300 W206 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 235 km/h | 15 km/h · C 300 W206 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.36 kg/hp | 7.51 kg/hp | better ratio · C 300 W206 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | C 300 W206 | 9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.63 s | 2.40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.70 s | 4.01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.52 s | 6.47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.03 s | 8.36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.04 s | 10.88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.25 s | 18.12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21.50 s | 31.70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.22 s | 16.22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.47 s | 28.57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 9G-Tronic automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the C 300 hits 100 km/h in 6.03 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 258 hp of power compensates. At this point, the C 300 leads by 2.33 s and sits roughly 27 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the C 300 is doing 132 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.55 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the C 300 crosses the line in 14.22 s versus 16.22 s. The 2.00 s gap represents roughly 82 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the C 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the C 300 finishes in 25.46 s versus 28.57 s, with a 3.10 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the C 300 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, C 300 W206 wins (6,03 s vs 8,36 s).
C 300 W206 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
C 300 W206: 258 hp, ratio 6,36 kg/hp. 9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
C 300 W206: 250 km/h. 9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h.