Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,94 s+0,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 13,47 s+0,10 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 24,55 s+0,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 257 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hp | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,24 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,07 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 7,19 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 12,14 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 13,47 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 24,55 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 5.31 s for the E 400 e 4MATIC. Despite lacking instant torque, 300 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 0.36 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 135 km/h for the E 400 e 4MATIC. The gap is 0.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 13.57 s. The 0.10 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The E 400 e 4MATIC maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the SQ2 keeps accelerating towards 257 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.10 s.
At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 24.58 s, with just 0.03 s to spare. The E 400 e 4MATIC fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the E 400 e 4MATIC never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.36 seconds. The 0.36 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,30 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. SQ2: 257 km/h.