Sur 0–100 km/h, Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 gagne (10,64 s vs 11,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 | HR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 10,64 s−0,56 s | 11,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,87 s−0,40 s | 18,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,99 s−0,82 s | 32,81 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 175 km/h | 188 km/h−13 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,75 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 | HR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,93 s | 2,85 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,42 s | 4,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 7,63 s | 8,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 10,64 s | 11,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 14,50 s | 15,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 27,54 s | 31,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,87 s | 18,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,99 s | 32,81 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 188 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 143 hp | Inline-4 Atkinson cycle E-Tech (HR16) |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 528 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 120 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 290 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 hits 100 km/h in 10.64 s versus 11.20 s for the HR-V. At this point, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 leads by 0.56 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 is doing 107 km/h against 105 km/h for the HR-V. The gap is 0.25 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 crosses the line in 17.87 s versus 18.27 s. The 0.40 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 149 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 finishes in 31.99 s versus 32.81 s, with a 0.82 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (175 vs 188 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 is capped at 175 km/h, the HR-V at 188 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.69 kg/hp vs 10.75 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.22 seconds. The 0.56 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 gagne (10,64 s vs 11,20 s).
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 10,64 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 143 hp, ratio 10,69 kg/hp. HR-V : 120 hp, ratio 10,75 kg/hp.
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 175 km/h. HR-V : 188 km/h.