Over 0–100 km/h, Clio 3 RS 200 wins (7,03 s vs 7,48 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
7.03 s
| Measure | Megane E-Tech Electric | Clio 3 RS 200 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.48 s | 7.03 s | 0.45 s · Clio 3 RS 200 |
| 400 m standing start | 15.59 s | 15.20 s | 0.39 s · Clio 3 RS 200 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.16 s | 27.23 s | 1.93 s · Clio 3 RS 200 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 223 km/h | 63 km/h · Clio 3 RS 200 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8.11 kg/hp | 6.20 kg/hp | better ratio · Clio 3 RS 200 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Megane E-Tech Electric | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.07 s | 2.02 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.46 s | 3.14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.62 s | 5.44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.48 s | 7.03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9.92 s | 9.53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.05 s | 16.04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 27.75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15.59 s | 15.20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.16 s | 27.23 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 223 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 768 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the Clio 3 RS 200 hits 100 km/h in 7.03 s versus 7.48 s for the Megane E-Tech Electric. Despite lacking instant torque, 200 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Clio 3 RS 200 leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Clio 3 RS 200 is doing 125 km/h against 123 km/h for the Megane E-Tech Electric. The gap is 0.21 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Clio 3 RS 200 crosses the line in 15.20 s versus 15.59 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Clio 3 RS 200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Clio 3 RS 200 finishes in 27.23 s versus 29.16 s, with a 1.93 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane E-Tech Electric is capped at 160 km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.47 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Clio 3 RS 200 wins (7,03 s vs 7,48 s).
Megane E-Tech Electric goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,48 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Megane E-Tech Electric: 218 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200: 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
Megane E-Tech Electric: 160 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200: 223 km/h.