Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Hatchbacks
AMeganevsBSpringBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMegane · Spring

Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs Dacia Spring Electric 65: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact · 2022 vs 2024 · Methodology
RenaultBEVFaster

Megane E-Tech Electric 217

218 hp · 300 Nm · 1,700 kg · 2022

VS
DaciaBEV

Spring Electric 65

65 hp · 113 Nm · 984 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

ARenault Megane E-Tech Electric 217

7.54 s

Gap5.94 sin favour of Megane E-Tech Electric 217
BDacia Spring Electric 65

13.48 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureMegane E-Tech Electric 217Spring Electric 65Gap
0–100 km/h7.54 s13.48 s5.94 s · Megane E-Tech Electric 217
400 m standing start15.62 s19.46 s3.84 s · Megane E-Tech Electric 217
1,000 m standing start29.17 s36.80 s7.63 s · Megane E-Tech Electric 217
Top speed (electronically limited)160 km/h125 km/h35 km/h · Megane E-Tech Electric 217
Power-to-weight ratio7.80 kg/hp15.14 kg/hpbetter ratio · Megane E-Tech Electric 217

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

RenaultBEVMegane E-Tech Electric 217
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
DaciaBEVSpring Electric 65
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageMegane E-Tech Electric 217Spring Electric 65
0–30 km/h2.13 s3.12 s
0–50 km/h3.56 s5.23 s
0–80 km/h5.75 s9.27 s
0–100 km/h7.54 s13.48 s
0–120 km/h9.87 s19.85 s
0–160 km/h17.64 s-
400 m standing start15.62 s19.46 s
1,000 m standing start29.17 s36.80 s
Top speed160 km/h125 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Renault

Megane E-Tech Electric 217

7,80kg/hpratio better by 7,34 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power218 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 700 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Dacia

Spring Electric 65

15,14kg/hpcompensated by −716 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power65 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor 48 kW
Torque113 Nm
Weight984 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 hits 100 km/h in 7.54 s versus 13.48 s for the Spring Electric 65. At this point, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 leads by 5.94 s and sits roughly 34 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 is doing 124 km/h against 97 km/h for the Spring Electric 65. The gap is 2.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 crosses the line in 15.61 s versus 19.46 s. The 3.84 s gap represents roughly 121 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 125 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 finishes in 29.16 s versus 36.79 s, with a 7.63 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 is capped at 160 km/h, the Spring Electric 65 at 125 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.80 kg/hp vs 15.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Spring Electric 65
Volkswagen ID.3 ProVolkswagen ID.3 Pro S

Other duels you might be interested in

RenaultVSXpeng

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs MONA M03

RenaultVSVolkswagen

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs ID.3 Pro

RenaultVSVolkswagen

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs ID.3 Pro S

RenaultVSBMW

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs i3s

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Megane E-Tech Electric 217 wins (7,54 s vs 13,48 s).

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,54 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Megane E-Tech Electric 217: 218 hp, ratio 7,80 kg/hp. Spring Electric 65: 65 hp, ratio 15,14 kg/hp.

Megane E-Tech Electric 217: 160 km/h. Spring Electric 65: 125 km/h.