Sur 0–100 km/h, Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 gagne (9,44 s vs 9,90 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 | Jazz e:HEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,44 s−0,46 s | 9,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,08 s−0,01 s | 17,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,54 s | 31,95 s+0,59 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 140 km/h | 170 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 11,04 kg/hpbetter ratio | 11,18 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 | Jazz e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,38 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,99 s | 3,30 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,76 s | 6,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,44 s | 9,90 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 13,10 s | 14,34 s |
| 0–160 km/h | - | 34,79 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,08 s | 17,09 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,54 s | 31,95 s |
| Top speed | 140 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (R135) |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 502 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed reducer (BEV) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 107 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 253 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 196 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 hits 100 km/h in 9.44 s versus 9.90 s for the Jazz e:HEV. The instant torque of 245 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the Jazz e:HEV is 10 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Jazz e:HEV is doing 106 km/h against 111 km/h for the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50. The gap is 0.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 crosses the line in 17.08 s versus 17.08 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 maxes out at 140 km/h while the Jazz e:HEV keeps accelerating towards 170 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.13 s.
Around 733 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Jazz e:HEV overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 30 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Jazz e:HEV finishes in 31.95 s versus 32.53 s. The 0.59 s delta in favour of the Jazz e:HEV shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 is capped at 140 km/h, the Jazz e:HEV at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.33 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 gagne (9,44 s vs 9,90 s).
Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 9,44 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 : 136 hp, ratio 11,04 kg/hp. Jazz e:HEV : 107 hp, ratio 11,18 kg/hp.
Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 : 140 km/h. Jazz e:HEV : 170 km/h.