Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AG6vsBQ4 45BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsG6 · Q4 45

Xpeng G6 vs Audi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

family SUV · 2023 vs 2023 · Methodology
XpengBEV

G6

292 hp · 440 Nm · 2,040 kg · 2023

VS
AudiBEV

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

286 hp · 545 Nm · 2,145 kg · 2023

Result · 0–100 km/h

AXpeng G6

6.82 s

Gap0.05 sNot a significant gap
BAudi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

6.77 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureG6Q4 45 e-tron 210 kWGap
0–100 km/h6.82 s6.77 s0.05 s · Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW
400 m standing start14.96 s14.99 s0.03 s · G6
1,000 m standing start26.82 s27.44 s0.62 s · G6
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h180 km/h20 km/h · G6
Power-to-weight ratio6.99 kg/hp7.50 kg/hpbetter ratio · G6

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

XpengBEVG6
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
AudiBEVQ4 45 e-tron 210 kW
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageG6Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW
0–30 km/h1.81 s1.79 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h3.01 s2.99 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h5.00 s4.96 s · tight gap
0–100 km/h6.82 s6.77 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h9.13 s9.11 s · tight gap
0–160 km/h15.54 s16.30 s
0–200 km/h25.78 s-
400 m standing start14.96 s · tight gap14.99 s
1,000 m standing start26.82 s27.44 s
Top speed200 km/h180 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Xpeng

G6

6,99kg/hpratio better by 0,51 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power292 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque440 Nm
Weight2 040 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Audi

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

7,50kg/hpcompensated by −105 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power286 hpPending
Torque545 Nm
Weight2 145 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxUnknown

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW hits 100 km/h in 6.77 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. The 0.05 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW is doing 125 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.03 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the G6 crosses the line in 14.96 s versus 14.98 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the G6 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 26.81 s versus 27.43 s, with a 0.62 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G6 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.99 kg/hp vs 7.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.55 seconds. The 0.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW
Tesla Model Y Juniper RWDBMW iX3

Other duels you might be interested in

XpengVSBMW

G6 vs iX3

VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

TeslaVSXpeng

Model Y Juniper RWD vs G6

VolvoVSAudi

XC40 Recharge Twin AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, G6 and Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW are neck and neck (6,77 s vs 6,82 s, no significant gap).

G6 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,82 seconds (calibrated simulation).

G6: 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp. Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW: 286 hp, ratio 7,50 kg/hp.

G6: 200 km/h. Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW: 180 km/h.