Over 0–100 km/h, G6 and MG4 Long Range RWD are neck and neck (6,73 s vs 6,82 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G6 | MG4 Long Range RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 6,73 s+0,09 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s | 14,92 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,82 s−0,42 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+20 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,99 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G6 | MG4 Long Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 1,92 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,00 s | 5,16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 6,73 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,13 s | 8,78 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,54 s | 15,38 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,78 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s | 14,92 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,82 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the MG4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the G6 is doing 126 km/h against 129 km/h for the MG4 Long Range RWD. The gap is 0.04 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the MG4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 14.96 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The MG4 Long Range RWD maxes out at 180 km/h while the G6 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 724 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the G6 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 26.81 s versus 27.23 s. The 0.42 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G6 is capped at 200 km/h, the MG4 Long Range RWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.99 kg/hp vs 7.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.49 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, G6 and MG4 Long Range RWD are neck and neck (6,73 s vs 6,82 s, no significant gap).
G6 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,82 seconds (calibrated simulation).
G6: 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp. MG4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp.
G6: 200 km/h. MG4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h.