Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,82 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Seal 313 2WD | G6 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.00 s | 6.82 s | 0.82 s · Seal 313 2WD |
| 400 m standing start | 14.21 s | 14.96 s | 0.75 s · Seal 313 2WD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.32 s | 26.82 s | 0.50 s · Seal 313 2WD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 200 km/h | 20 km/h · G6 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.35 kg/hp | 6.99 kg/hp | better ratio · Seal 313 2WD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Seal 313 2WD | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.74 s · tight gap | 1.81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.90 s · tight gap | 3.01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.66 s | 5.00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.00 s | 6.82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.72 s | 9.13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.20 s | 15.54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 25.78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.21 s | 14.96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.32 s | 26.82 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. At this point, the Seal 313 2WD leads by 0.82 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.96 s. The 0.75 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the G6 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.94 s from 0.75 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Seal 313 2WD finishes in 26.31 s versus 26.81 s, with just 0.50 s to spare. The G6 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the G6 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.35 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.49 seconds. The 0.82 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,82 s).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. G6: 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. G6: 200 km/h.