Over 0–100 km/h, G9 and ID.4 Pro are neck and neck (8,51 s vs 8,55 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | G9 | ID.4 Pro | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.51 s | 8.55 s | 0.04 s · G9 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.32 s | 16.43 s | 0.11 s · G9 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.71 s | 29.78 s | 1.07 s · G9 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 180 km/h | 20 km/h · G9 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.18 kg/hp | 10.07 kg/hp | better ratio · G9 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | G9 | ID.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.41 s | 2.23 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.03 s | 3.72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.49 s | 6.22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.51 s · tight gap | 8.55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11.09 s | 11.63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.51 s | 22.13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.05 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16.32 s · tight gap | 16.43 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.71 s | 29.78 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 124 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the G9 hits 100 km/h in 8.51 s versus 8.55 s for the ID.4 Pro. The 0.04 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the ID.4 Pro is doing 116 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 0.14 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the G9 crosses the line in 16.32 s versus 16.42 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the G9 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 169 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G9 finishes in 28.71 s versus 29.78 s, with a 1.07 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G9 is capped at 200 km/h, the ID.4 Pro at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 10.07 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.60 seconds. The 0.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, G9 and ID.4 Pro are neck and neck (8,51 s vs 8,55 s, no significant gap).
G9 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,51 seconds (calibrated simulation).
G9: 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. ID.4 Pro: 211 hp, ratio 10,07 kg/hp.
G9: 200 km/h. ID.4 Pro: 180 km/h.