Among the 14 compacts hybrid 2018–2022, the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS ranks 2nd of 12 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100, behind the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS), 2nd of 11 in Tank range (1136 km, behind the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS), 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (10.2 s, behind the Toyota Corolla GR Sport Hybrid).
i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS
136 hp, 10,2 s 0-100 : among the 14 compacts hybrid 2018–2022, the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS ranks 2nd of 12 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 11 in Tank range, 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
136hp
320 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
10.2s
VMax 200 km/h
Cons.
4.4L
/100 km
Tank
50L
Full specifications Hyundai i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,598 cm³ |
| Power | 136 hp |
| Couple | 320 Nm |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 10,2 s |
| VMax | 200 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,455 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm |
| Width | 1,795 mm |
| Height | 1,425 mm |
| Boot | 450 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,335 kg |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 compacts hybrid, the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 12 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100), 2nd of 11 in Tank range (1136 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS (1st with 4.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS (1st with 1136 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.4 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 12 in Combined consumption)
The i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS consumes 4.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS (4.4 L/100).
Tank range: 1136 km (2nd of 11 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS covers 1136 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1136 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS stands against compacts hybrid
Comparison across 14 compacts hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai i30 PD range
Generation PD launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the PD
Popular duels involving the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS
Hyundai i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1136 km on a full tank (4.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 11 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS leads in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100 vs 4.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i30 Fastback 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS vs Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.