Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch
110 hp, 12,3 s 0-100 : among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch ranks 75th of 137 in Combined consumption, 76th of 130 in Tank range, 142th of 143 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 110 hp
- 144 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 12.3 s
- VMax 187 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.9 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,498 cm³
- Power
- 110 hp
- Couple
- 144 Nm
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.9 L/100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 12,3 s
- VMax
- 187 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,340 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,650 mm
- Width
- 1,795 mm
- Height
- 1,455 mm
- Boot
- 395 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,176 kg
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 143 compacts, the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (75th of 137 in Combined consumption)
The i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 847 km (76th of 130 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch covers 847 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai i30 PD range
Generation PD launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the PD
Popular duels involving the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch
Continue with the Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch
The same car, from other angles.
Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch rank in its segment?
Among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch ranks 75th of 137 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 76th of 130 in Tank range (847 km, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 142th of 143 in 0–100 km/h (12.3 s, behind the BMW M140i xDrive).
What is the range of the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch?
847 km on a full tank (5.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 76th of 130 in Tank range.
How much does the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 216d Steptronic instead?
The BMW 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i30 1.5 DPi 110 ch vs BMW 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.