Huracán LP 610-4
610 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 21 S 2012–2016, the Huracán LP 610-4 ranks 7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 3rd of 21 in Top speed, 3rd of 21 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
610hp
560 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.2s
VMax 325 km/h
Cons.
—L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Huracán LP 610-4
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 610 hp |
| Couple | 560 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Huracán LP 610-4 |
Consumption
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,2 s |
| VMax | 325 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,924 mm |
| Height | 1,165 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,553 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 21 S, the Huracán LP 610-4 ranks (top 7 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h), 3rd of 21 in Power-to-weight (393 hp/t). 7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h), 3rd of 21 in Power-to-weight (393 hp/t).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Huracán LP 610-4 ranks 7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet (2.9 s).
Top speed: 325 km/h (3rd of 21 in Top speed)
Top speed of 325 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Huracán LP 610-4 stands against S
Comparison across 21 S marketed between 2012–2016.
0–100 km/h
7eout of 21
Top speed
3eout of 21
Power-to-weight
3eout of 21
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Roma
620 hp · 0-100 3.4 s
Portofino M
620 hp · 0-100 3.5 s
Portofino
600 hp · 0-100 3.5 s
911 Turbo S
588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Huracán LP 610-4
Take the next step
Find a Huracán LP 610-4 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Huracán LP 610-4: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 21 S 2012–2016, the Huracán LP 610-4 ranks 7th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 3rd of 21 in Power-to-weight (393 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 3.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Huracán LP 610-4 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.