991.2 · GENERATION 2017 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 Turbo S

588 hp, 2,9 s 0-100 : among the 47 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo S ranks 8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 7th of 47 in Top speed, 9th of 47 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,89015,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

588hp

700 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

2.9s

VMax 330 km/h

Cons.

11.2L

/100 km

Tank

67.758839L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo S

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Twin-Turbo
Displacement3,800 cm\u00b3
Puissance thermique588 hp
Combined power588 hp
Combined torque700 Nm
GearboxDUAL_CLUTCH 7 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11,2 L/100km
Tank67.758839 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h2,9 s
VMax330 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,507 mm
Wheelbase2,450 mm
Width1,880 mm
Height1,297 mm
Boot260 L
Kerb weight1,600 kg
Cd0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 47 S, the 911 Turbo S ranks (top 8 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 7th of 47 in Top speed (330 km/h), 9th of 47 in Power-to-weight (368 hp/t). 8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 7th of 47 in Top speed (330 km/h), 9th of 47 in Power-to-weight (368 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 2.9 s 0-100 (8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo S ranks 8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).

Top speed: 330 km/h (7th of 47 in Top speed)

Top speed of 330 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 Turbo S stands against S

Comparison across 47 S marketed between 2015–2019.

0–100 km/h

8eout of 47

2,9 s
Min4,6 s · Porsche 718 Cayman
Max2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35

Top speed

7eout of 47

330 km/h
Min250 km/h · Toyota GR Supra A90
Max350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S

Power-to-weight

9eout of 47

368 hp/t
Min221 hp/t · Toyota GR Supra A90
Max524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche 911 991.2 range

Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 991.2

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo S

Take the next step

Find a 911 Turbo S or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 Turbo S: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 911 Turbo S rank in its segment?#

Among the 47 S 2015–2019, the 911 Turbo S ranks 8th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 7th of 47 in Top speed (330 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 9th of 47 in Power-to-weight (368 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).

How much does the 911 Turbo S cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Nissan GT-R 570 R35 instead?#

The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 2.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo S vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.