Peugeot 508 PureTech 180 EAT8
179 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 53 saloons 2016–2020, the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 ranks 30th of 53 in Combined consumption, 9th of 45 in Tank range, 47th of 53 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 179 hp
- 250 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.2 s
- VMax 230 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.3 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,598 cm³
- Power
- 179 hp
- Couple
- 250 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,2 s
- VMax
- 230 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 1,490 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
- CO₂ WLTP
- 144 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 53 saloons, the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
saloon among the best in segment: 9th of 45 in Tank range (1048 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.3 L/100 L/100 (30th of 53 in Combined consumption)
The 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 consumes 6.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1048 km (9th of 45 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 covers 1048 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot 508 II range
Generation II launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Popular duels involving the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8
Continue with the Peugeot 508 PureTech 180 EAT8
The same car, from other angles.
Peugeot 508 PureTech 180 EAT8: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 rank in its segment?
Among the 53 saloons 2016–2020, the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 ranks 30th of 53 in Combined consumption (6.3 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 9th of 45 in Tank range (1048 km, behind the BMW 420d), 47th of 53 in 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
What is the range of the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8?
1048 km on a full tank (6.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 9th of 45 in Tank range.
How much does the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 420d instead?
The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 6.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 508 PureTech 180 EAT8 vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.