991.1 · GENERATION 2011 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 GT3 RS

500 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 43 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 43 in Top speed, 2nd of 43 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,32715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

500hp

460 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.9s

VMax 311 km/h

Cons.

14.3L

/100 km

Tank

67.001757L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 GT3 RS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement3,800 cm³
Puissance thermique456 hp
Combined power500 hp
Combined torque460 Nm
GearboxManuelle Manuelle
TransmissionPropulsion

Consumption

Cons. WLTP14.3 L/100km
Tank67.001757 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,9 s
VMax311 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,481 mm
Wheelbase2,355 mm
Width1,808 mm
Height1,280 mm
Boot4 L
Kerb weight1,370 kg
Cd0.33

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 43 S, the 911 GT3 RS ranks (top 8 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 8th of 43 in Top speed (311 km/h), 2nd of 43 in Power-to-weight (365 hp/t). 8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 8th of 43 in Top speed (311 km/h), 2nd of 43 in Power-to-weight (365 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).

Top speed: 311 km/h (8th of 43 in Top speed)

Top speed of 311 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 GT3 RS stands against S

Comparison across 43 S marketed between 2009–2013.

0–100 km/h8e / 43
3,9 s
Min 5,1 s · Porsche Boxster SMax 2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Top speed8e / 43
311 km/h
Min 267 km/h · Porsche Boxster SpyderMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Power-to-weight2e / 43
365 hp/t
Min 226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)Max 444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 GT3 RS

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 GT3 RS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 43 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 8th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 8th of 43 in Top speed (311 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 2nd of 43 in Power-to-weight (365 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 GT3 RS vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.