Among the 56 S 2017–2021, the Huracán EVO ranks 6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 9th of 56 in Top speed (325 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 8th of 56 in Power-to-weight (414 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
I · GENERATION 2019 → · SPORTS CAR
LamborghiniICE
Huracán EVO
639 hp, 2,9 s 0-100 : among the 56 S 2017–2021, the Huracán EVO ranks 6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h, 9th of 56 in Top speed, 8th of 56 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
639hp
600 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
2.9s
VMax 325 km/h
Cons.
—L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Huracán EVO
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 639 hp |
| Couple | 600 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 2,9 s |
| VMax | 325 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,924 mm |
| Height | 1,165 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,542 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 56 S, the Huracán EVO ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 9th of 56 in Top speed (325 km/h), 8th of 56 in Power-to-weight (414 hp/t). 6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s), 9th of 56 in Top speed (325 km/h), 8th of 56 in Power-to-weight (414 hp/t).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 2.9 s 0-100 (6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Huracán EVO ranks 6th of 56 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 325 km/h (9th of 56 in Top speed)
Top speed of 325 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Huracán EVO stands against S
Comparison across 56 S marketed between 2017–2021.
0–100 km/h6e / 56
2,9 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed9e / 56
325 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Toyota GR Supra 3.0Max 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight8e / 56
414 hp/t
Min 219 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
911 Turbo S588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Huracán EVO
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Huracán EVO: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 2.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Huracán EVO vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.