Among the 46 S 2018–2022, the Huracán EVO RWD ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 5th of 46 in Top speed (325 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 9th of 46 in Power-to-weight (404 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ).
I · GENERATION 2020 → · SPORTS CAR
LamborghiniICE
Huracán EVO RWD
610 hp, 3,3 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2018–2022, the Huracán EVO RWD ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 46 in Top speed, 9th of 46 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador SVJ. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
610hp
600 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.3s
VMax 325 km/h
Cons.
—L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Huracán EVO RWD
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 610 hp |
| Couple | 600 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,3 s |
| VMax | 325 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,924 mm |
| Height | 1,165 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,509 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 46 S, the Huracán EVO RWD ranks (top 9 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 5th of 46 in Top speed (325 km/h), 9th of 46 in Power-to-weight (404 hp/t). 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 5th of 46 in Top speed (325 km/h), 9th of 46 in Power-to-weight (404 hp/t).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 2.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.3 s 0-100 (9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Huracán EVO RWD ranks 9th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (2.8 s).
Top speed: 325 km/h (5th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 325 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Huracán EVO RWD stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2018–2022.
0–100 km/h9e / 46
3,3 s
Min 5,7 s · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 2,8 s · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Top speed5e / 46
325 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Toyota GR Supra 3.0Max 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight9e / 46
404 hp/t
Min 188 hp/t · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 505 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
911 Turbo S588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Huracán EVO RWD
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Huracán EVO RWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador SVJ leads in 0–100 km/h (2.8 s vs 3.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Huracán EVO RWD vs Lamborghini Aventador SVJ duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.