991.1 · GENERATION 2011 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 Turbo

507 hp, 3,3 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Turbo ranks 3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 33 in Top speed, 5th of 33 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,22515,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

507hp

700 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.3s

VMax 312 km/h

Cons.

12.5L

/100 km

Tank

67.001757L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 Turbo

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · Naturally Aspirated
Displacement3,800 cm\u00b3
Puissance thermique507 hp
Combined power507 hp
Combined torque700 Nm
GearboxDUAL_CLUTCH Unknown
TransmissionPorsche Traction Management (PTM) with controlled multiple-disc clutch

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12,5 L/100km
Tank67.001757 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,3 s
VMax312 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,477 mm
Wheelbase2,350 mm
Width1,852 mm
Height1,300 mm
Boot190 L
Kerb weight1,570 kg
Cd0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 33 S, the 911 Turbo ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 4th of 33 in Top speed (312 km/h), 5th of 33 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t). 3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s), 4th of 33 in Top speed (312 km/h), 5th of 33 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.3 s 0-100 (3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 Turbo ranks 3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).

Top speed: 312 km/h (4th of 33 in Top speed)

Top speed of 312 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 Turbo stands against S

Comparison across 33 S marketed between 2009–2013.

0–100 km/h

3eout of 33

3,3 s
Min5,0 s · Porsche Cayman S (Manual)
Max2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700

Top speed

4eout of 33

312 km/h
Min275 km/h · Porsche Cayman S PDK
Max350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700

Power-to-weight

5eout of 33

323 hp/t
Min226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)
Max444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 Turbo

Take the next step

Find a 911 Turbo or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 Turbo: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 911 Turbo rank in its segment?#

Among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Turbo ranks 3rd of 33 in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 4th of 33 in Top speed (312 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 5th of 33 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).

How much does the 911 Turbo cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Lamborghini Aventador LP700 instead?#

The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 3.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Turbo vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.