Among the 58 S 2015–2019, the 911 Carrera 4S ranks 30th of 58 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 32th of 58 in Top speed (304 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 32th of 58 in Power-to-weight (286 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
991.2 · GENERATION 2017 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Carrera 4S
426 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 58 S 2015–2019, the 911 Carrera 4S ranks 30th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 32th of 58 in Top speed, 32th of 58 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
426hp
499 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.9s
VMax 304 km/h
Cons.
10.2L
/100 km
Tank
17.9L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Carrera 4S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 2,981 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 426 hp |
| Combined power | 426 hp |
| Combined torque | 499 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 17.9 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,9 s |
| VMax | 304 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,499 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,296 mm |
| Boot | 260 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,490 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 58 S, the 911 Carrera 4S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (30th of 58 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera 4S ranks 30th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 1.2 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 304 km/h (32th of 58 in Top speed)
Top speed of 304 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Carrera 4S stands against S
Comparison across 58 S marketed between 2015–2019.
0–100 km/h30e / 58
3,9 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed32e / 58
304 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight32e / 58
286 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche 911 991.2 range
Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 991.2
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera 4S
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Carrera 4S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera 4S vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.