911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet
480 hp, 3,7 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2016–2020, the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet ranks 27th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 21th of 46 in Top speed, 22th of 46 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
480hp
570 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.7s
VMax 309 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Twin-Turbo |
| Displacement | 2,981 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance thermique | 456 hp |
| Combined power | 480 hp |
| Combined torque | 570 Nm |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | RWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11,2 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,7 s |
| VMax | 309 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,528 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,291 mm |
| Boot | 160 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,520 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 46 S, the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Acceleration: 3.7 s 0-100 (27th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet ranks 27th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 309 km/h (21th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 309 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h
27eout of 46
Top speed
21eout of 46
Power-to-weight
22eout of 46
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575
575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Portofino
600 hp · 0-100 3.5 s
Huracán LP 610-4
610 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Huracán EVO RWD
610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche 911 991.2 range
Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 991.2
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet
Take the next step
Find a 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 46 S 2016–2020, the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet ranks 27th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.7 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 21th of 46 in Top speed (309 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 22th of 46 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera GTS Cabriolet vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.