Among the 58 S 2016–2020, the 911 Targa 4 GTS ranks 24th of 58 in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 24th of 58 in Top speed (307 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 29th of 58 in Power-to-weight (288 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
991.2 · GENERATION 2018 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Targa 4 GTS
456 hp, 3,6 s 0-100 : among the 58 S 2016–2020, the 911 Targa 4 GTS ranks 24th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 24th of 58 in Top speed, 29th of 58 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
456hp
549 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.6s
VMax 307 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
67.758839L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Targa 4 GTS
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 2,981 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 456 hp |
| Combined power | 456 hp |
| Combined torque | 549 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 67.758839 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,6 s |
| VMax | 307 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,528 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,291 mm |
| Boot | 160 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,585 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 58 S, the 911 Targa 4 GTS ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 3.6 s 0-100 (24th of 58 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Targa 4 GTS ranks 24th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 0.9 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 307 km/h (24th of 58 in Top speed)
Top speed of 307 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Targa 4 GTS stands against S
Comparison across 58 S marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h24e / 58
3,6 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed24e / 58
307 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight29e / 58
288 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Huracán EVO RWD610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche 911 991.2 range
Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 991.2
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Targa 4 GTS
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Targa 4 GTS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.6 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Targa 4 GTS vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.