Among the 58 S 2016–2020, the 718 Cayman S ranks 39th of 58 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 52th of 58 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 46th of 58 in Power-to-weight (258 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
718 · GENERATION 2018 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
718 Cayman S
350 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 58 S 2016–2020, the 718 Cayman S ranks 39th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 52th of 58 in Top speed, 46th of 58 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
350hp
420 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.1s
VMax 285 km/h
Cons.
10.7L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 718 Cayman S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 4 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 2,497 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 355 hp |
| Combined power | 350 hp |
| Combined torque | 420 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,1 s |
| 0 → 160 km/h | 9,50 s |
| VMax | 285 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,379 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,475 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm |
| Height | 1,295 mm |
| Boot | 5 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,355 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 58 S, the 718 Cayman S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (39th of 58 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 718 Cayman S ranks 39th of 58 in 0–100 km/h, 1.4 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 285 km/h (52th of 58 in Top speed)
Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 718 Cayman S stands against S
Comparison across 58 S marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h39e / 58
4,1 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 BoxsterMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed52e / 58
285 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight46e / 58
258 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Z4 sDrive30i258 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayman 718 range
Generation 718 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 718
Compare
Popular duels involving the 718 Cayman S
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 718 Cayman S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 718 Cayman S vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.