Among the 21 S 2020–2024, the 718 Cayman GT4 RS ranks 8th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s, behind the Lamborghini Huracán STO), 8th of 21 in Top speed (315 km/h, behind the Ferrari 812 GTS), 10th of 21 in Power-to-weight (342 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 GTS).
718 · GENERATION 2022 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
718 Cayman GT4 RS
500 hp, 3,4 s 0-100 : among the 21 S 2020–2024, the 718 Cayman GT4 RS ranks 8th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 21 in Top speed, 10th of 21 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
500hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.4s
VMax 315 km/h
Cons.
-L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 RS
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,996 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 500 hp |
| Combined power | 500 hp |
| Combined torque | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,4 s |
| 0 → 160 km/h | 7,10 s |
| 0 → 200 km/h | 10,90 s |
| VMax | 315 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,455 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,484 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm |
| Height | 1,267 mm |
| Boot | 4 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,464 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 21 S, the 718 Cayman GT4 RS ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 3.4 s 0-100 (8th of 21 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 718 Cayman GT4 RS ranks 8th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Lamborghini Huracán STO (3.0 s).
Top speed: 315 km/h (8th of 21 in Top speed)
Top speed of 315 km/h. The segment reference reaches 340 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 718 Cayman GT4 RS stands against S
Comparison across 21 S marketed between 2020–2024.
0–100 km/h8e / 21
3,4 s
Min 5,7 s · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 3,0 s · Lamborghini Huracán STO
Top speed8e / 21
315 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 340 km/h · Ferrari 812 GTS
Power-to-weight10e / 21
342 hp/t
Min 188 hp/t · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 490 hp/t · Ferrari 812 GTS
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Huracán EVO RWD610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Huracán LP 610-4610 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Huracán EVO639 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayman 718 range
Generation 718 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 718
Compare
Popular duels involving the 718 Cayman GT4 RS
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 RS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Huracán STO leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 3.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 718 Cayman GT4 RS vs Lamborghini Huracán STO duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.