X4 xDrive30i
252 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 29 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 xDrive30i ranks 15th of 29 in Combined consumption, 12th of 25 in Tank range, 16th of 29 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
252hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.3s
VMax 240 km/h
Cons.
7.3L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X4 xDrive30i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 252 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7,3 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,3 s |
| VMax | 240 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,752 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,864 mm |
| Width | 1,918 mm |
| Height | 1,621 mm |
| Boot | 525 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,720 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 168 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 29 D-SUV, the X4 xDrive30i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 7.3 L/100 L/100 (15th of 29 in Combined consumption)
The X4 xDrive30i consumes 7.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 890 km (12th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X4 xDrive30i covers 890 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1214 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the X4 xDrive30i stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 29 D-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption
15eout of 29
Tank range
12eout of 25
0–100 km/h
16eout of 29
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Macan
252 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
Macan
245 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic
238 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Q5 SUV
272 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X4 G02 range
Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G02
Compare
Popular duels involving the X4 xDrive30i
Take the next step
Find a X4 xDrive30i or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW X4 xDrive30i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 29 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 xDrive30i ranks 15th of 29 in Combined consumption (7.3 L/100, behind the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8), 12th of 25 in Tank range (890 km, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 16th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
890 km on a full tank (7.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 12th of 25 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 7.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 xDrive30i vs DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.