Among the 30 M 2019–2023, the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer ranks 10th of 30 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 10th of 29 in Tank range (1109 km, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 18th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (9.4 s, behind the Bmw 225i xDrive Active Tourer).
218d Steptronic Gran Tourer
150 hp, 9,4 s 0-100 : among the 30 M 2019–2023, the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer ranks 10th of 30 in Combined consumption, 10th of 29 in Tank range, 18th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.4s
VMax 207 km/h
Cons.
4.6L
/100 km
Tank
51L
Full specifications BMW 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 51 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,4 s |
| VMax | 207 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,568 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,780 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,608 mm |
| Boot | 645 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,545 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 122 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 M, the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer ranks (top 10 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 10th of 30 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100), 10th of 29 in Tank range (1109 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (1st with 4.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (1st with 1275 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (10th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (4.0 L/100).
Tank range: 1109 km (10th of 29 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer covers 1109 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1275 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer stands against M
Comparison across 30 M marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Popular duels involving the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer
BMW 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1109 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 10th of 29 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Active Tourer leads in Combined consumption (4.0 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 218d Steptronic Gran Tourer vs Bmw 216d Active Tourer duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.