BMW M240i xDrive Convertible
340 hp, 4,6 s 0-100 : among the 18 compacts 2019–2023, the M240i xDrive Convertible ranks 3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h, 13th of 18 in Top speed, 14th of 18 in Power-to-weight, behind the only BMW M2. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 340 hp
- 500 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.6 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 8.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 52 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,998 cm³
- Power
- 340 hp
- Couple
- 500 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 8.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 52 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,6 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,454 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,690 mm
- Width
- 1,774 mm
- Height
- 1,403 mm
- Boot
- 280 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,720 kg
- Cd
- 0.36
- CO₂ WLTP
- 187 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 18 compacts, the M240i xDrive Convertible ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s). 3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M2 (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the BMW M2 (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.6 s 0-100 (3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M240i xDrive Convertible ranks 3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference BMW M2 (4.1 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (13th of 18 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the M240i xDrive Convertible stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Popular duels involving the M240i xDrive Convertible
Continue with the BMW M240i xDrive Convertible
The same car, from other angles.
BMW M240i xDrive Convertible: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the M240i xDrive Convertible rank in its segment?
Among the 18 compacts 2019–2023, the M240i xDrive Convertible ranks 3rd of 18 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s, behind the BMW M2), 13th of 18 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the BMW M2), 14th of 18 in Power-to-weight (198 hp/t, behind the BMW M2).
How much does the M240i xDrive Convertible cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW M2 instead?
The BMW M2 leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.6 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M240i xDrive Convertible vs BMW M2 duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.