Among the 21 saloons hybrid 2019–2023, the 318d Touring Steptronic ranks 2nd of 21 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 14th of 20 in Tank range (930 km, behind the Bmw 330d), 20th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (8.7 s, behind the Bmw M340i xDrive).
318d Touring Steptronic
150 hp, 8,7 s 0-100 : among the 21 saloons hybrid 2019–2023, the 318d Touring Steptronic ranks 2nd of 21 in Combined consumption, 14th of 20 in Tank range, 20th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
320 Nm · 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
8.7s
VMax 215 km/h
Cons.
4.3L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Full specifications BMW 318d Touring Steptronic
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 11 hp |
| Combined power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 320 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.3 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,7 s |
| VMax | 215 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,440 mm |
| Boot | 500 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,630 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 114 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 21 saloons hybrid, the 318d Touring Steptronic ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 21 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 330d (1st with 1255 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.3 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 21 in Combined consumption)
The 318d Touring Steptronic consumes 4.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.1 L/100).
Tank range: 930 km (14th of 20 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 318d Touring Steptronic covers 930 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1255 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 318d Touring Steptronic stands against saloons hybrid
Comparison across 21 saloons hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Popular duels involving the 318d Touring Steptronic
BMW 318d Touring Steptronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
930 km on a full tank (4.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 14th of 20 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 318d Touring Steptronic vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.