320d xDrive Touring
190 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 84 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 6th of 84 in Combined consumption, 41th of 74 in Tank range, 58th of 84 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.4s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
4.5L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 320d xDrive Touring
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,4 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm |
| Boot | 500 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,690 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 119 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 84 saloons, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 6th of 84 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (6th of 84 in Combined consumption)
The 320d xDrive Touring consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 889 km (41th of 74 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 320d xDrive Touring covers 889 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 320d xDrive Touring stands against saloons
Comparison across 84 saloons marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption
6eout of 84
Tank range
41eout of 74
0–100 km/h
58eout of 84
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A4 40 TDI
190 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A5 Sedan
204 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A5 Sedan TDI quattro S tronic 150 kW
204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
A5 Avant
204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Compare
Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive Touring
Take the next step
Find a 320d xDrive Touring or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 320d xDrive Touring: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 84 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 6th of 84 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 41th of 74 in Tank range (889 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 58th of 84 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
889 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 41th of 74 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive Touring vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.