BMW 318i Sedan
156 hp, 8,4 s 0-100 : among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 318i Sedan ranks 30th of 86 in Combined consumption, 16th of 73 in Tank range, 82th of 86 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 156 hp
- 250 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.4 s
- VMax 223 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.7 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 156 hp
- Couple
- 250 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.7 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,4 s
- VMax
- 223 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,709 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,851 mm
- Width
- 1,827 mm
- Height
- 1,435 mm
- Boot
- 480 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,490 kg
- Cd
- 0.23
- CO₂ WLTP
- 130 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 86 saloons, the 318i Sedan ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 16th of 73 in Tank range (1035 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (30th of 86 in Combined consumption)
The 318i Sedan consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1035 km (16th of 73 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 318i Sedan covers 1035 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 318i Sedan stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Popular duels involving the 318i Sedan
Continue with the BMW 318i Sedan
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 318i Sedan: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 318i Sedan rank in its segment?
Among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 318i Sedan ranks 30th of 86 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 16th of 73 in Tank range (1035 km, behind the BMW 420d), 82th of 86 in 0–100 km/h (8.4 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
What is the range of the 318i Sedan?
1035 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 16th of 73 in Tank range.
How much does the 318i Sedan cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 420d instead?
The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 318i Sedan vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.