G30 · GENERATION 2020 · GRAND TOURER
BMWMHEV

530i xDrive Touring

252 hp, 6,6 s 0-100 : among the 51 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 530i xDrive Touring ranks 38th of 51 in Combined consumption, 38th of 51 in Tank range, 32th of 51 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,93915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

252hp

350 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.6s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

6.4L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 530i xDrive Touring

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,998 cm³
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power252 hp
Couple350 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.4 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,6 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,963 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width1,868 mm
Height1,498 mm
Boot560 L
Kerb weight1,790 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP147 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 51 grand tourers hybrid, the 530i xDrive Touring ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 520d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 520d (1st with 1535 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (38th of 51 in Combined consumption)

The 530i xDrive Touring consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 1063 km (38th of 51 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 530i xDrive Touring covers 1063 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 530i xDrive Touring stands against grand tourers hybrid

Comparison across 51 grand tourers hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption38e / 51
6.4 L/100
Min 7.4 L/100 · Bmw 640i xDrive Gran TurismoMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 520d
Tank range38e / 51
1 063 km
Min 919 km · Bmw 640i xDrive Gran TurismoMax 1 535 km · Bmw 520d
0–100 km/h32e / 51
6,6 s
Min 8,3 s · Bmw 520i TouringMax 4,6 s · Bmw 540d xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 5 Series G30 range

Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G30

Compare

Popular duels involving the 530i xDrive Touring

Frequently asked questions

BMW 530i xDrive Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 51 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 530i xDrive Touring ranks 38th of 51 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 38th of 51 in Tank range (1063 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 32th of 51 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s, behind the Bmw 540d xDrive).

1063 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 38th of 51 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 530i xDrive Touring vs Bmw 520d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.