Among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 16th of 93 in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 16th of 91 in Tank range (1347 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 91th of 93 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).
620d Gran Turismo
190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 16th of 93 in Combined consumption, 16th of 91 in Tank range, 91th of 93 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.9s
VMax 220 km/h
Cons.
4.9L
/100 km
Tank
66L
Full specifications BMW 620d Gran Turismo
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 66 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,9 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,091 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,070 mm |
| Width | 1,902 mm |
| Height | 1,538 mm |
| Boot | 610 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,765 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 129 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 93 grand tourers, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks (top 16 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 16th of 93 in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100), 16th of 91 in Tank range (1347 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 520d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 520d (1st with 1535 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.9 L/100 L/100 (16th of 93 in Combined consumption)
The 620d Gran Turismo consumes 4.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1347 km (16th of 91 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 620d Gran Turismo covers 1347 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 620d Gran Turismo stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 93 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 6 Series G32 range
Generation G32 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G32
Popular duels involving the 620d Gran Turismo
BMW 620d Gran Turismo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1347 km on a full tank (4.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 16th of 91 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 4.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 620d Gran Turismo vs Bmw 520d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.