BMW X4 xDrive30i
252 hp, 6,4 s 0-100 : among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 xDrive30i ranks 11th of 27 in Combined consumption, 9th of 25 in Tank range, 18th of 27 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 252 hp
- 350 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.4 s
- VMax 240 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.9 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 65 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 252 hp
- Couple
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.9 L/100 km
- Tank
- 65 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,4 s
- VMax
- 240 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,752 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,864 mm
- Width
- 1,918 mm
- Height
- 1,621 mm
- Boot
- 520 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,760 kg
- Cd
- 0.3
- CO₂ WLTP
- 159 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 27 D-SUV, the X4 xDrive30i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
D-SUV among the best in segment: 9th of 25 in Tank range (942 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X3 xDrive20d (1st with 1333 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.9 L/100 L/100 (11th of 27 in Combined consumption)
The X4 xDrive30i consumes 6.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 942 km (9th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X4 xDrive30i covers 942 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X4 xDrive30i stands against D-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X4 G02 range
Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G02
Popular duels involving the X4 xDrive30i
Continue with the BMW X4 xDrive30i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X4 xDrive30i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X4 xDrive30i rank in its segment?
Among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 xDrive30i ranks 11th of 27 in Combined consumption (6.9 L/100, behind the BMW X3 xDrive20d), 9th of 25 in Tank range (942 km, behind the BMW X3 xDrive20d), 18th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (6.4 s, behind the BMW X3 M Competition).
What is the range of the X4 xDrive30i?
942 km on a full tank (6.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 9th of 25 in Tank range.
How much does the X4 xDrive30i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X3 xDrive20d instead?
The BMW X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 xDrive30i vs BMW X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.