G02 · GENERATION 2021 · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE

X4 xDrive20d

190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 xDrive20d ranks 3rd of 27 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 25 in Tank range, 23th of 27 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,67515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.9s

VMax 213 km/h

Cons.

5.1L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X4 xDrive20d

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.1 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,9 s
VMax213 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,752 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,918 mm
Height1,621 mm
Boot525 L
Kerb weight1,850 kg
Cd0.3
CO₂ WLTP133 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 27 D-SUV, the X4 xDrive20d ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 27 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 2nd of 25 in Tank range (1333 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 1333 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 27 in Combined consumption)

The X4 xDrive20d consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 1333 km (2nd of 25 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X4 xDrive20d covers 1333 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X4 xDrive20d stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 27 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

Combined consumption3e / 27
5.1 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8
Tank range2e / 25
1 333 km
Min 577 km · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 1 333 km · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h23e / 27
7,9 s
Min 11,8 s · Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X4 G02 range

Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G02

Compare

Popular duels involving the X4 xDrive20d

Frequently asked questions

BMW X4 xDrive20d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 xDrive20d ranks 3rd of 27 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8), 2nd of 25 in Tank range (1333 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 23th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).

1333 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 25 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 xDrive20d vs DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.