On a 100 km mixed trip, the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 and Peugeot e-308 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
443 €per year
14,8 kWh/100 km weighted · 2,96 € per 100 km · 2 215 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | e-208 | e-308 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 377 € | 520 € | 143 € | e-208 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 443 € | 469 € | 26 € | e-208 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 524 € | 433 € | 92 € | e-308 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 and Peugeot e-308 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 offers more range: 427 km vs 415 km for Peugeot e-308 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.