On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 and Renault Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
509 €per year
17,0 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,39 € per 100 km · 2 543 kWh per year
Cheaper to run526 €per year
17,5 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,50 € per 100 km · 2 626 kWh per year
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Scenic | Zoe | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 433 € | 479 € | 46 € | Scenic |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 509 € | 526 € | 17 € | Scenic |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 602 € | 570 € | 32 € | Zoe |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 and Renault Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 offers more range: 430 km vs 395 km for Renault Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.