Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 Sportback e-tron wins (7,52 s vs 8,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q6 Sportback e-tron | EV6 RWD Standard Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,52 s−1,11 s | 8,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s−0,84 s | 16,45 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,40 s−1,82 s | 30,22 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+25 km/h | 185 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,43 kg/hpbetter ratio | 11,47 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q6 Sportback e-tron | EV6 RWD Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,08 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,17 s | 3,48 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,40 s | 6,10 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,52 s | 8,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,28 s | 11,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,94 s | 24,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 36,01 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 16,45 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,40 s | 30,22 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 185 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 950 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Q6 Sportback e-tron hits 100 km/h in 7.52 s versus 8.63 s for the EV6 RWD Standard Range. At this point, the Q6 Sportback e-tron leads by 1.11 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q6 Sportback e-tron is doing 120 km/h against 114 km/h for the EV6 RWD Standard Range. The gap is 0.53 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q6 Sportback e-tron crosses the line in 15.60 s versus 16.45 s. The 0.85 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q6 Sportback e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 164 km/h versus 153 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q6 Sportback e-tron finishes in 28.40 s versus 30.22 s, with a 1.82 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 210 km/h, the EV6 RWD Standard Range at 185 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.43 kg/hp vs 11.47 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.21 seconds. The 1.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 Sportback e-tron wins (7,52 s vs 8,63 s).
Q6 Sportback e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,52 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q6 Sportback e-tron: 252 hp, ratio 8,43 kg/hp. EV6 RWD Standard Range: 170 hp, ratio 11,47 kg/hp.
Q6 Sportback e-tron: 210 km/h. EV6 RWD Standard Range: 185 km/h.