Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | iX3 G08 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s−0,88 s | 6,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s−0,81 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s−1,13 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+50 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | iX3 G08 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 9,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 16,42 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 6.86 s for the Bmw iX3. At this point, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 leads by 0.88 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 0.78 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 15.07 s. The 0.80 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 finishes in 26.41 s versus 27.54 s, with a 1.13 s lead.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw iX3 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.23 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.53 seconds. The 0.88 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,86 s).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,98 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. iX3 G08 : 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 230 km/h. iX3 G08 : 180 km/h.