Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AM5vsB911Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM5 · 911

BMW M5 CS F90 vs Porsche 911 GT3 RS 991.2: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2021 vs 2016 · Methodology
BMWPetrolFaster

M5 CS F90

635 hp · 750 Nm · 1,825 kg · 2021

VS
PorschePetrol

911 GT3 RS 991.2

507 hp · 460 Nm · 1,420 kg · 2016

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW M5 CS F90

3.03 s

Gap0.24 sin favour of M5 CS
BPorsche 911 GT3 RS 991.2

3.26 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM5 CS F90911 GT3 RS 991.2Gap
0–100 km/h3.03 s3.26 s0.24 s · M5 CS F90
400 m standing start10.82 s11.02 s0.20 s · M5 CS F90
1,000 m standing start19.94 s19.95 s0.01 s · M5 CS F90
Top speed (electronically limited)295 km/h312 km/h17 km/h · 911 GT3 RS 991.2
Power-to-weight ratio2.87 kg/hp2.80 kg/hpbetter ratio · 911 GT3 RS 991.2

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWPetrolM5 CS F90
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
PorschePetrol911 GT3 RS 991.2
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageM5 CS F90911 GT3 RS 991.2
0–30 km/h0.91 s · tight gap0.93 s
0–50 km/h1.51 s · tight gap1.54 s
0–80 km/h2.37 s2.52 s
0–100 km/h3.03 s3.26 s
0–120 km/h3.74 s4.21 s
0–160 km/h6.21 s6.60 s
0–200 km/h9.97 s · tight gap9.98 s
400 m standing start10.82 s11.02 s
1,000 m standing start19.94 s · tight gap19.95 s
Top speed295 km/h312 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

M5 CS F90

2,87kg/hpcompensated by −405 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power635 hpPending
Torque750 Nm
Weight1 825 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling
Porsche

911 GT3 RS 991.2

2,80kg/hpratio better by 0,07 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power507 hpB6
Torque460 Nm
Weight1 420 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxDUAL_CLUTCH

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the M5 CS hits 100 km/h in 3.03 s versus 3.26 s for the 911 GT3 RS. At this point, the M5 CS leads by 0.24 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the M5 CS is doing 170 km/h against 169 km/h for the 911 GT3 RS. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the M5 CS crosses the line in 10.81 s versus 11.02 s. The 0.21 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The M5 CS maxes out at 295 km/h while the 911 GT3 RS keeps accelerating towards 312 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.14 s.

At 1,000 metres, the M5 CS finishes in 19.94 s versus 19.95 s, with just 0.01 s to spare. The 911 GT3 RS fails to fully close the launch gap.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The M5 CS features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 911 GT3 RS’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 305 km/h, the M5 CS never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.87 kg/hp vs 2.80 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.73 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of 911 GT3 RS 991.2
Audi RS6 Performance AvantAudi A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M5 CS vs RS6 Performance Avant

JaguarVSPorsche

F-TYPE R P575 vs 911 GT3 RS

BMWVSAudi

M5 CS vs A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

LamborghiniVSPorsche

Huracán EVO RWD vs 911 GT3 RS

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 wins (3,03 s vs 3,26 s).

M5 CS F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).

M5 CS F90: 635 hp, ratio 2,87 kg/hp. 911 GT3 RS 991.2: 507 hp, ratio 2,80 kg/hp.

M5 CS F90: 295 km/h. 911 GT3 RS 991.2: 312 km/h.