991.2 · GENERATION 2016 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 GT3 RS

507 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 42 S 2014–2018, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 17th of 42 in Top speed, 9th of 42 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,45415,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

507hp

460 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.2s

VMax 311 km/h

Cons.

14.7L

/100 km

Tank

16.9L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 GT3 RS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement3,996 cm³
Puissance thermique507 hp
Combined power507 hp
Combined torque460 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionPropulsion

Consumption

Cons. WLTP14.7 L/100km
Tank16.9 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,2 s
VMax311 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,544 mm
Width1,841 mm
Boot4 L
Kerb weight1,420 kg
Cd0.34

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 42 S, the 911 GT3 RS ranks (top 12 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 9th of 42 in Power-to-weight (357 hp/t). 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 9th of 42 in Power-to-weight (357 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).

Top speed: 311 km/h (17th of 42 in Top speed)

Top speed of 311 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 GT3 RS stands against S

Comparison across 42 S marketed between 2014–2018.

0–100 km/h12e / 42
3,2 s
Min 4,8 s · Porsche Cayman SMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed17e / 42
311 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight9e / 42
357 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche 911 991.2 range

Generation 991.2 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 991.2

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 GT3 RS

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 GT3 RS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 42 S 2014–2018, the 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 42 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 17th of 42 in Top speed (311 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 9th of 42 in Power-to-weight (357 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 GT3 RS vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.