Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD wins (7,76 s vs 9,90 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV 200kW 2WD | Jazz e:HEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s−2,14 s | 9,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s−1,35 s | 17,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s−3,74 s | 31,95 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+10 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 11,18 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV 200kW 2WD | Jazz e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,20 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,68 s | 3,30 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,92 s | 6,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 9,90 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,11 s | 14,34 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,24 s | 34,79 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 17,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 31,95 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 107 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 253 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 196 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Han EV 200kW 2WD hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 9.90 s for the Jazz e:HEV. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 2.14 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD is doing 123 km/h against 106 km/h for the Jazz e:HEV. The gap is 0.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Han EV 200kW 2WD crosses the line in 15.74 s versus 17.08 s. The 1.34 s gap represents roughly 48 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 142 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD finishes in 28.20 s versus 31.95 s, with a 3.74 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 170 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Han EV 200kW 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Jazz e:HEV at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.33 seconds. The 2.14 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD wins (7,76 s vs 9,90 s).
Han EV 200kW 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp. Jazz e:HEV: 107 hp, ratio 11,18 kg/hp.
Han EV 200kW 2WD: 180 km/h. Jazz e:HEV: 170 km/h.